Monday, April 9, 2018

Who Should Pay the Piper for Facebook? (& the rest)

It's the economics, stupid! -- that's the fundamental problem / fundamental fix
[Update 4/10/18: Zuckerberg hints that "certainly we consider" ideas in the direction suggested here.]
[Update 5/4/18: Bloomberg reports: Facebook Weighs Ad-Free Subscription Option] 
[A newer post, Privacy AND Innovation ...NOT Oligopoly -- A Market Solution to a Market Problem, focuses on regulatory issues, and other newer posts of relevance are in this list.]
The Facebook fiasco spotlights the perfect storm we now face, as the dream of digital media empowerment turns sour. Many have suggested a range of remedies. But at its heart this is a business model problem -- we may need a multi-pronged remedial effort, but without fixing the underlying business model, other measures will have limited effectiveness. We have not been imaginative about the business model -- but we can do much better. This post explains how.

Tim Berners-Lee (inventor and champion of the Web) put his finger on this issue: 
Two myths currently limit our collective imagination: the myth that advertising is the only possible business model for online companies, and the myth that it’s too late to change the way platforms operate. ...On both points, we need to be a little more creative. Create a new set of incentives and changes...will follow.
Facebook brought this to a head, but the ugly glare falls on Google, Twitter, and others. Many rightly blame this “original sin” of the Internet ad model that enabled wide access to “free” services. It is now all too clear why it matters that “if you are not paying, you are the product.” We created an “attention market” monster that seeks only to "engage" us -- an economy of clickbait and misuse of our own data. That threatens our privacy, our mental health, and the very democracy we thought digital media would enhance. Internet services have lost our trust. How can we get them to serve our needs? We must realign basic incentives.

It is true that many factors are at play: oligopolies fed by data moats and returns to scale; closed, opaque systems that confine us to anti-competitive “walled gardens;” amoral advertisers seeking profit from us; and even enemies of our democracy. We almost certainly need regulation on data ownership/privacy and concentrations of power -- but those will take time to shape, and they will always be crude and inflexible instruments.

What we can do now, to facilitate all of the rest, is to change the fundamental economics of social media by introducing new and better incentive structures -- from the operational roots, up. We need to align value creation and value capture to better serve users, and thus regain their trust. Facebook, Google, Twitter, and the others can move on their own in that direction now (and can profit from that). Lacking that, we can actively encourage competitors to do better. Doing this will change the incentives that drive our attention economy -- faster and more surely than regulation. ...But we may need regulation too.

Many see this need for a new social contract, one that recognizes that if we are to have “our” media serve us -- as people and as citizens -- we must pay to make that sustainable. When we pay for our media, we become the customer they are driven to serve. We need to vote with dollars, not just “likes” -- to pay for what we value, and motivate our services to serve us. Incentive structures determine actions. Driving engagement to sell ads drives these services in the wrong direction. So, how can we re-engineer our incentive structures for digital media services?

What we have here is failure of imagination 

Zuckerberg admits to the problem, but sees no solution. The Times asked him “about Facebook’s business model -- selling advertisers and developers the ability to target Facebook users based on their personal data." He described his dilemma:
…having [Facebook] be free and have a business model that is ad-supported ends up being really important and aligned…Now, over time, might there be ways for people who can afford it to pay a different way? That’s certainly something we’ve thought about …But I don’t think the ad model is going to go away, because I think fundamentally, it’s important to have a service like this that everyone in the world can use, and the only way to do that is to have it be very cheap or free.
Zuckerberg fails to see that solutions are emerging to enable that “it be very cheap or free” for some, but sustained by user payments from others (those who can afford to pay a fair and sustaining price for the value they receive). That seems impractical only because we are stuck in our old logic. 
  1. The old logic of scarcity, rather than the new logic of digital abundance
  2. The old, but aberrant, logic of pre-set prices
In this digital age we can not only deliver services widely at very low cost, but we can mass-customize prices – not secretly, to exploit customers, but openly, in ways that customers buy-in to as fair.
  • We are so used to the alienating 20th century model of mass-marketing based on pre-set prices (and driven by advertising) that we don’t see how consumers can work together with businesses to set customized prices that are fair for each of us. 
  • What is fair depends on realized value (who, what, where, when, how, and why) and on ability to pay. But now we can apply the power of digital to restore and improve on the principles of value-based pricing that humans have relied on for millennia to take those value factors into account. Doing that is not only good citizenship, but good business. 
We need to re-invent our business models and pricing architectures to apply a new logic more suited to our new digital economy.

FairPay points to a better way

One architecture for moving toward such a new logic, called FairPay, has gained recognition for operationalizing a solution for businesses now (as outlined in the Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, and a nicely illustrated summary of that, and previously in Harvard Business Review). The details will depend on context, and will need testing to evolve and refine over time, but the principles are clear and well supported.

Digital goods and services are not scarce -- but the willingness of consumers to sustain service providers is scarce. FairPay structures an “invisible handshake” to seek a fair allocation of that willingness to sustain over the course of the relationship. (It considers total value, both to the consumer and from the consumer, including use of personal data and attention to ads). To each provider according to their ability to create and deliver actual value. From each consumer according to their willingness and ability to pay to sustain that. (...With incentives that ensure both.)

The FairPay architecture centers on the continuing relationships we have with our digital services providers. The digital economy facilitates and thrives on ongoing relationships -- many are awakening to the deep changes of our shift to "The Subscription Economy." Those relationships can be managed to work as a “repeated game” (see details) that motivates mutual cooperation, fairness, dialog, trust, and transparency – to keep the game going. We create a process that repeatedly customizes fair prices for the value realized in each relationship -- for consumers who may be rich or poor, heavy or light users, and tolerant or intolerant of advertising and uses of personal data. (See this detailed use-case example.) By doing that, these services can generate good revenue from most customers -- and can make judicious levels of advertising acceptable to many of them.  

Many are calling for similar shifts in our economics: rethinking the value of our data as labor, membership models, and even proposals to turn Twitter into a cooperative. But FairPay shows how companies and consumers can embrace this new invisible handshake to move in desired directions now, fully embedded into routine operations, without waiting for new laws or new capital structures.

By harmonizing fundamental business incentives in this way, we will break the vicious cycle of exploitation and abuse, make services both affordable and sustainable, regain trust between businesses and their customers, and shape a new social contract. Working under that new social contract will reduce the need for externally imposed remedies -- and better position us to apply external remediation to our markets where needed.

Taking action now, at Facebook's initiative?

FairPay is a fundamental architecture for ongoing business-customer relationships that harmonizes the entire spectrum of current practices ranging from conventional pricing to radical extremes like pay what you want. It is applicable to profit enterprises and nonprofits alike (and it is in the public domain, for anyone to apply). Businesses like Facebook can better understand their current incentive models from this value-based perspective, and can test and gradually introduce more innovative models in ways that ensure they actually make their incentives more win-win. That can both increase profits and also empower consumers, by creating more cooperative, transparent, and trusting relationships.

Ideally, such a transition could be entirely self-initiated by Facebook (and the other platforms).
  • Facebook could first test FairPay at the margins, for specific "premium" services like reducing ad loads and giving users more control over filtering criteria and data privacy. [**See update below suggesting Facebook is considering this.] 
  • This could include "reverse metering" to recognize and give credit for the value that users provide to Facebook, paying with their attention and their data. The same FairPay process can let users individually determine what level of advertising and data usage they will tolerate, in return for reduced payments. 
  • Even with a significant level of advertising revenue continuing, sharing that revenue with the customer would shift platform incentives toward satisfying users and providing ads that the customer considers relevant (effectively making the advertiser the consumer's customer). 
  • That reverse meter could also credit user-generated content and viral sharing. 
Simple trials at the margins could begin to shift some percentage of Facebook revenue to be user-funded, rather than ad-funded. Once trialed with privacy-sensitive and social-welfare-minded users, it could be proven, refined, and extended to others to shift the revenue base more broadly. As the percentage of user revenue increases, Facebook would be inherently motivated to be more user-value-first in its decision processes.

Facebook reported that in the US and Canada it generates about $7/month in advertising revenue per user. (Of course that is now under serious threat, as based on advertising abuses and monopoly rents. Is it fair that Facebook gain such high margins? Perhaps it should be only a fraction of that, say $1-2/month.) 

Whatever the fair level of revenue per user with its current model, expecting revenue of comparable magnitude from a shift to user-paid revenue does not seem outlandish, at least for a significant portion of users who want and can afford a premium, ad-free (or ad-reduced) and privacy-strict service. For them, a rate of even $10 per month may not be unreasonable (perhaps even more for some users with full-feature, high usage and high ability to pay). Gradually, the broad range of users could be phased in, including large numbers at rates that are "very cheap or free."

But still, there is the question of what is a fair profit margin for Facebook's service -- are current levels unfairly high monopoly rents and spoils of abuse? That brings us to consideration of more forceful change...

A heavier hand? -- mandated gradual improvement (the vehicle emissions regulation model)

To the extent that Facebook and the others fail to shift their incentive structures deeply and quickly enough, external measures can be applied by competitors, and by government. 

  • Many have proposed competitive efforts, new "alt-Facebook"services that offer more customer-first business models and practices. FairPay can help make those strategies successful. But the path to scale at the level of Facebook seems slow and difficult. Given the severity and urgency of the crisis we are now facing, mandated action by Facebook may be required. 
  • Here too, changing the fundamental incentives -- and monitoring and tuning them to ensure that they work as desired -- is the best way to achieve results. 
  • Change can be mandated in much the same way that we mandate increasingly strict vehicle emission standards. Shifting at once to a reader revenue model would be challenging, and something Facebook management and shareowners might be very reluctant to pursue. But regulation could be staged to require that X% of revenue must be user-derived by some date -- with X starting small, but then increasing in stages over time. As X increases, incentives for tolerating ad-related abuse would be reduced and offset by pressure to be customer-first. Let Facebook figure out how best to do that, but give them targets over time, and hold them to it.
If we force digital services businesses to find more win-win customer-sustained business models, they will find ways to to do that far better that we can yet imagine -- whether with forms of FairPay, or some variation on similar themes. That will make them and their users (and all citizens) much happier. But if we as consumers and citizens and regulators don't have the imagination to push them to use their imagination, they will not try very hard.

The nuclear option? - regulation as a public utility

Of course, given the gravity of the threat to public welfare and the urgency of change in corporate mind-set -- and the fact that Facebook currently provides what some might view as "essential" communication services along our social graph that we would not want to do without -- providing utility services -- there is an obvious extreme option.  Nationalize Facebook, or at least regulate it as a public utility, funded by its users, with government subsidies as needed (much as was done with the Bell System). This might be done as a temporary custodianship that would revert to private control when appropriate. Such a structure would immediately incentivize Facebook to put public welfare first. That may seem drastic, but is that so unreasonable for an essential public service that can do great harm if misused?

  • The Bell System was a regulated monopoly until 1982, when it was broken up into independent "Baby Bells" connecting to users, long distance services, and equipment suppliers. 
  • Telephone service regulation followed the earlier and still continuing example of railroads being regulated as "common carriers."
  • Postal services have always been public services, paid in part by users, but subsidized by governments as needed. 
  • Public radio and TV are government-funded with voluntary payments by users. 
Hasn't Facebook become a common carrier? How can it be reasonable for Zuckerberg to have the unchecked, unmonitored, exclusive control of this new "Pa Mark" that that serves all of us as a utility (much as "Ma Bell" did)? Clearly, there is an antitrust case here, and the breakup of Ma Bell is instructive, as I explore more deeply on my other blog.

Toward a win-win future

Any of these options (alone or in combination) would begin to change the fundamental incentive structures of our essential digital services -- more or less dramatically. We can apply the heavy hand of regulation* -- but to the extent we can shift internal corporate operational incentives to align with consumer welfare -- we are likely to achieve better outcomes more organically, in ways that are more continuously adaptable to changing needs and ongoing technical advances. To the extent business see that and act to get ahead of this, they can solve the problem better that regulators, at least in large part.

  • Whatever we do, we need to move quickly and decisively. Facebook still can take the initiative, and perhaps retain a high degree of autonomy. Alternatively, we may conclude we need stronger and swifter measures. In any case, it is essential that we put the consumer (and the public) first, by putting incentives in place to drive that.
  • The surest way to do that is by having the consumer pay -- so that Facebook is driven at every level to satisfy them, and not the advertisers and hucksters who seek to buy consumer attention cheaply. 
  • We need to have the imagination to rethink our obsolete economic assumptions, to get creative about mass-customizing our value propositions, and to seek a path up this ladder of value.

FairPay is one architecture that points in that direction. If you don't like that one, find another. In any case, we need to move aggressively on whatever path we can manage to find, as long as it leads toward full, fair, and transparent alignment of value creation and value capture. 

------------------------
[*Update 4/9/18: An excellent summary of how intractable regulatory solutions are is in today's column in The Information by Sam Lessin. I commented on it: changing the business model economics would reduce the severity of the abuses that regulation can only crudely seek to remedy.] 

[**Update 4/10/18: Zuckerberg suggested in his Senate testimony that Facebook would “certainly consider ideas like that.” As reported: "By not rejecting the possibility of a paid product, Mr. Zuckerberg’s comment could be interpreted as endorsing the idea that Facebook might experiment with a version of its social network that relies on subscription revenue instead of advertising."

------------------------
More on this theme

Newer posts: 
Older related points: 
Another prior post, How Market Commerce Can Become More Cooperative, Fair, and Human, addresses Twitter (when there was some excitement about the idea of turning it into a cooperative). The same principles can apply to any digital service to consumers.

Other posts in this FairPayZone.com blog explain the key principles that enable this:
Broad suggestions on opening up the platform oligopolies are in a post on my other blog:  "Architecting Our Platforms to Better Serve Us -- Augmenting and Modularizing the Algorithm"

Other selected items on my other blog are also very relevant.

------------------------
More about FairPay

My article in the Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, "A Novel Architecture to Monetize Digital Offerings" provides an overview of FairPay (summarized more briefly in the ESADE Knowledge article "Three building blocks to monetize a digital business," and previously in Harvard Business Review, "When Selling Digital Content, Let the Customer Set the Price.").

For a full introduction to FairPay see the Overview and the sidebar on How FairPay Works (just to the right, if reading this at FairPayZone.com). There is also a guide to More Details (including links to a video). 

Even better, read my highly praised new book: FairPay: Adaptively Win-Win Customer Relationships.

(FairPay is an open architecture, in the public domain.)  

(My work on FairPay is pro-bono. I offer free consultation to those interested in applying FairPay, and welcome questions.)

53 comments:

  1. This is an awesome post. Really very informative and creative contents. This concept is a good way to enhance the knowledge. I like it and help me to development very well. Thank you for this brief explanation and very nice information. Well, got a good knowledge.
    online E-commerce software.

    ReplyDelete
  2. A genuine case of the utilization of social media to spread messages and association was as of late shown by Michael Jackson's own specialist.אינדקס אתרים

    ReplyDelete
  3. No doubt this is an excellent post I got a lot of knowledge after reading good luck. Theme of blog is excellent there is almost everything to read, Brilliant post.
    Mason Soiza

    ReplyDelete
  4. Marketing plays an important role in establishing relationships between customers and the organizations offering to the market. The marketing function is also tasked with branding of the organization, participating in publicity activities, advertising and customer interaction through feedback collection.

    ReplyDelete
  5. facebook is the best source of marketing..if some how your website getting low traffic you must promote it on faacebook..buyrealsocial.com

    ReplyDelete
  6. Is Facebook a referral source yet you at last need to get guests over to your internet business store or site? What do you need them to do when they get to your Facebook page? facebook photo liker

    ReplyDelete
  7. Each advertiser can set a monthly budget, and a maximum cost per click by keyword. We've seen budgets ranging from $50 per month to $500,000 per month and even more. To provide useful guidance, our benchmark shows average results for a group of approximately fifty advertisers on the Google AdWords ad network.

    ReplyDelete
  8. You know your projects stand out of the herd. There is something special about them. It seems to me all of them are really brilliant! Pay2Amigos

    ReplyDelete
  9. Wow! I am very happy to read this. Actually Fantastic. I am also an expert in this topic so I can understand your hard work. Appreciate your sharing this best article. Digital Marketing company Noida

    ReplyDelete
  10. This is such a great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. I love seeing websites that understand the value of providing a quality resource for free. It is the old what goes around comes around routine. Buy Negative Facebook Reviews

    ReplyDelete
  11. I use basically superior fabrics : you will discover these products by: Latest SEO strategy

    ReplyDelete
  12. Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed browsing your blog posts. After all I’ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again soon! facebook account buy

    ReplyDelete
  13. Individuals will consistently make a move on things they're keen on. All in all, to draw in with possibilities and clients ask yourself:INDIAN SMM Panel "What might make somebody truly be keen on and connect with the items and administrations I offer?".

    ReplyDelete
  14. An expanding number of marketing offices would now be able to make for you vivified recordings that are uncommonly streamlined for Facebook. Facebook video downloader

    ReplyDelete
  15. Best & Cheapest SMM Panel
    https://smmprince.in/
    SMMPrince has the Best & Cheapest SMM Panel and 100% High Quality for all social networks. Get the best Instagram panel today!
    Best & Cheapest SMM Panel

    ReplyDelete
  16. I am astounded with regards to how extraordinary this article is. The substance is easy to comprehend and exceptionally captivating. This is by a long shot the absolute best substance I've seen.


    SEO services in kolkata
    Best SEO services in kolkata
    SEO company in kolkata
    Best SEO company in kolkata
    Top SEO company in kolkata
    Top SEO services in kolkata
    SEO services in India
    SEO copmany in India

    ReplyDelete
  17. Buy Google Reviews
    Google Reviews send customers a positive or negative response to your business, online-store, Restaurant or requirements. You can Expect your SEO rank of google reviews. Scroll down you can see the advantage of buying google reviews We will discuss many kinds of topic about buying Google reviews.

    We know all reviews platform always promote your business and also virtual shopping assistant. So, We provide fresh/real/good Ip’s Reviews with multiple devices. Our reviews will be not removed on your business page, maps, places. We can do USA, UK, CA and AU profile must be. also if you need any custom country we can do that. actually our service worldwide
    buy now

    ReplyDelete
  18. Gmail is a free service provided by Google. A user can access play store, Gmail, google drive, google plus, etc. So, Gmail is the most important thing. You can also used those Gmail in Email Marketing campaigns, and sneaker bots, Google Adwords, Cloud, and more platforms. But old or aged Gmail is best because it had survived by fighting. The new ones are fresh but the old ones have more experience than the new ones. It is not easily damaged.
    visit my site

    ReplyDelete
  19. 나는 당신의 게시물이 너무나 좋은 주제에 압도되었습니다. 보통 저는 여러분의 블로그를 방문하고 여러분이 포함한 정보를 통해 업데이트를받습니다.하지만 오늘의 블로그가 가장 감사 할 것입니다. 잘 했어 먹튀커뮤니티

    ReplyDelete
  20. The next time I read a blog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as much as this one. I mean, I know it was my choice to read, but I actually thought you have something interesting to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about something that you could fix if you weren't too busy looking for attention 먹튀검증

    ReplyDelete
  21. Very rapidly this site will be famous among all blogging and site-building users, due to it's good articles dentist in tijuana mexico

    ReplyDelete
  22. 게시 된 기사는 매우 유익하고 유용했습니다. 여러분은 훌륭한 일을하고 있습니다. 계속가 먹튀검증

    ReplyDelete
  23. This is often moreover a fairly good blog post that we certainly cherished analyzing. Not necessarily every single day which enjoy the chances to find a product. Business Cards

    ReplyDelete
  24. I am contemplating this topic. I think you can solve my problems. My site is at "온라인바둑이". I hope you can help me.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Hello, I'm happy to see some great articles on your site. Would you like to come to my site later? My site also has posts, comments and communities similar to yours. Please visit and take a look 사설토토사이트

    ReplyDelete
  26. Shopping for Google Opinions could be a highly effective strategy to promote your website or weblog. You would possibly suppose that having the voice of your organization heard on Google is an efficient technique to construct up your model, however sadly, that goodwill is not going to come low cost. On common, the value of a Google search range from $35 - $70, whereas the value varies significantly for various firms. It's due to this fact necessary to grasp simply what you'll be able to count on while you Buy Positive Google Reviews, the best way to use them in your marketing campaign, and the place to purchase them from, to be sure you get one of the best worth for money.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Thanks , I’ve just been looking for info about this subject for a long time and yours is the best I have found out till now. But, what in regards to the bottom line? Are you certain in regards to the source? 먹튀검증

    ReplyDelete
  28. I learned a lot from you.토토사이트 I have a hobby similar to yours.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I've been looking for photos and articles on this topic over the past few days due to a school assignment, and I'm really happy to find a post with the material I was looking for! I bookmark and will come often! Thanks :D 토토사이트

    ReplyDelete
  30. I have gained a lot from reading this article. Please write a lot of articles related to 먹튀검증 in the future.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I am overwhelmed by your post with such a nice topic. Usually I visit your 메이저토토사이트 and get updated through the information you include but today’s blog would be the most appreciable. Well done!

    ReplyDelete
  32. There must have been many difficulties in providing this information.메이저토토사이트 Nevertheless, thank you for providing such high-quality information.

    ReplyDelete
  33. This is one very interesting post. I like the way you write and I will bookmark your blog to my favorites. 온라인홀덤

    ReplyDelete
  34. As I am looking at your writing, I regret being unable to do outdoor activities due to Corona 19, and I miss my old daily life. If you also miss the daily life of those days, would you please visit my site once? My site is a site where I post about photos and daily life when I was free.토토커뮤니티

    ReplyDelete
  35. We all need to see this kind of information, and we really hope that this article will spread widely.메이저안전놀이터 May the good things always be full.

    ReplyDelete
  36. You have fantastic composing abilities. I'm so delighted to locate the exact same subject I have actually been searching for. Everybody is providing me a great deal of praises now. You're impressive. As an author, you're so trendy since you're such a fantastic author. Why do not you come as well as see my article? check this link right here now

    ReplyDelete
  37. I would like to thank you for the efforts you have put in penning this site. I’m hoping to view the same high-grade content by you later on as well. In truth, your creative writing abilities has motivated me to get my own, personal website now. ty le keo

    ReplyDelete
  38. Great delivery. Sound arguments. Keep up the great effort. 야한동영상

    ReplyDelete
  39. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  40. It's an remarkable paragraph in favor of all the web viewers; they will obtain advantage from it. I am sure.

    휴게텔

    ReplyDelete
  41. You really make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this matter to be really something which I think I would never understand. It seems too complicated and very broad for me. I am looking forward for your next post, I will try to get the hang of it!

    횟수 무제한 출장

    ReplyDelete
  42. Spot on with this write-up, I truly believe that this website needs a lot more attention. I'll probably be back again to read more, thanks for the advice!

    스포츠마사지

    ReplyDelete
  43. Hello! Nice to meet you, I say . The name of the community I run is 먹튀검증사이트, and the community I run contains articles similar to your blog. If you have time, I would be very grateful if you visit my site .

    ReplyDelete
  44. You made some good points there. I did a Google search about the topic and found most people will believe your blog. 메리트카지노


    ReplyDelete

  45. This site seems to inspire me a lot. Thank you so much for organizing and providing this quality information in an easy to understand way. I think that a healthy era of big data can be maintained only when such high-quality information is continuously produced. And I, too, are working hard to organize and provide such high-quality information. It would be nice to come in once and get information.

    Also visit my site:경마

    ReplyDelete
  46. I figure this article can be enhanced a tad. There are a couple of things that are dangerous here, and if you somehow managed to change these things, this article could wind up a standout amongst your best ones. I have a few thoughts with respect to how you can change these things. 메이저놀이터


    ReplyDelete
  47. Thank you for this wonderful post! It has long been extremely helpful. 메이저사이트I wish that you will carry on posting your knowledge with us.


    ReplyDelete